Recover From Coercive Control
Hinduism
Smartism
Also known as Smarta Tradition, Panchaayatana Puja, or Smarta Sampradaya
Founded by Adi Shankaracharya
c.700s -
Established in Kerala, India. Currently in Australia, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Fiji, Mauritius, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States, Canada, and Trinidad and Tobago.
Estimated followers: Unknown (millions)
Summary of Beliefs
Smartism, a significant tradition within Hinduism, centres around the philosophy of Advaita Vedanta, which teaches the non-dualistic view that the ultimate reality, Brahman, is singular and beyond duality. According to Advaita Vedanta, the individual self, or Atman, is fundamentally one with Brahman, emphasising the unity of all existence. This philosophical perspective, established by Adi Shankaracharya, underpins Smartism’s approach to spirituality and understanding of the divine.
In practice, Smartism promotes the worship of five principal deities: Shiva, Vishnu, Devi (the Goddess), Surya (the Sun), and Ganesha. This inclusive approach allows followers to engage with various forms of divine presence, reflecting the tradition's adaptability and broad scope. Rituals and practices include daily worship (puja), meditation, and the study of key scriptures such as the Vedas, Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita, and Brahma Sutras. By integrating diverse deities and practices, Smartism fosters a holistic spiritual experience that accommodates a wide range of devotional expressions.
Analysis Using Renée's Cult Ranking
1. Authoritative Leadership
Score: 0
Smartism does not have a central authoritative figure. It follows the teachings of Adi Shankaracharya, but local temples and communities operate independently, encouraging personal spiritual development.
2. Control Over Information
Score: 0
Information about Smartism is openly available through scriptures like the Vedas and Upanishads, as well as contemporary resources. There is no centralised control over religious knowledge.
3. Deception
Score: 0
The principles and teachings of Smartism are transparent and openly shared with adherents and the broader public. There is no deceptive recruitment or hiding of its doctrines.
4. Exclusive Knowledge
Score: 0
Smartism acknowledges multiple paths to the divine and does not claim exclusivity over spiritual knowledge. It respects various forms of worship and religious expressions within Hinduism.
5. Exploitation
Score: 0
There is no evidence of exploitation within Smartism. Participation in rituals, donations, and community service is voluntary and based on personal devotion.
6. Fear, Guilt, & Intimidation
Score: 0
Smartism focuses on the positive aspects of spiritual growth and enlightenment. It does not use fear, guilt, or intimidation to control its followers.
7. Isolation
Score: 0
Followers of Smartism are not isolated from broader society. They actively engage in interfaith dialogues and community activities, integrating their spiritual practices with everyday life.
8. Micro-Management of Daily Tasks
Score: 0
There is no coercion or micro-management of daily activities. Smartism encourages self-discipline and personal responsibility in following spiritual practices.
9. Monitoring Thoughts & Behaviours
Score: 0
Smartism advocates for personal spiritual exploration without intrusive monitoring. There is respect for individual autonomy in thought and behaviour.
10. Punishment & Discipline
Score: 0
Discipline within Smartism is guided by personal and ethical development rather than punitive measures. Followers are encouraged to cultivate virtues like truth, non-violence, and compassion.
11. Thought Reform
Score: 0
Smartism promotes philosophical and spiritual teachings but does not employ coercive methods to reform thoughts. It respects diverse interpretations and personal growth in understanding.
12. Us vs. Them Mentality
Score: 0
Smartism does not foster an "us vs. them" mentality. It embraces the idea that all paths lead to the same divine source, promoting unity and respect among different religious practices.
Total Score: 0/36
Overall Cult Ranking: 0. Safe Group
According to Renee's Cult Ranking System, Smartism in Australia scores 0 out of 36, categorising it as a Safe Group. This indicates that Smartism displays none of the characteristics commonly associated with harmful cults. It fosters an environment of spiritual growth, respect for diverse beliefs, and integration with broader society.
Smartism in Australia is characterised by its inclusive approach to spirituality, philosophical depth, and respect for individual autonomy. It does not exhibit any cult-like behaviours and provides a supportive and open environment for its followers. As such, it is a safe and enriching religious tradition for those who practise it.
Further Reading
Sovereign citizens becoming increasing burden on Australian courts, says NSW Magistrate.
‘Moving towards violence’: Authorities alert to radicalised sovereign citizens
Magistrates witness a 'sharp rise' in sovereign citizen cases brought before the local courts
IS IT A CULT?: Response from
Smartism
No known response.
Support available for anyone impacted by a high-control groups or relationships, and want to speak to someone who understands coercive control and the road to recovery
These assessments evaluate group dynamics, particularly patterns associated with coercive control. They are not determinations about whether any individual has or has not experienced trauma, abuse, or harm. Personal impact varies widely. Coercive control often develops through an accumulation of influences rather than a single event, though specific moments — such as discovering deception or betrayal — can themselves be deeply distressing or traumatic. If your experiences in a group have affected your wellbeing, support from a trauma-informed counsellor or therapist can be an important step toward understanding, healing, and regaining a sense of autonomy. Assessments provided here are conducted using Renée's Cult Ranking system and reflect her personal opinions, which are based on online sources and personal testimonies. Renée acknowledges that groups can change over time, for better or worse, and that individual experiences within any given group can vary. Renée is open to respectful discussions and encourages diverse perspectives to foster a better understanding of matters raised.