1. Authoritative Leadership

Score: 3

OneTaste was founded and led by Nicole Daedone, who was viewed as a charismatic authority figure. Multiple reports describe her exercising absolute control, demanding reverence, and creating a hierarchical structure where dissent was not tolerated.

2. Control Over Information

Score: 2

Information about the group’s inner workings was selectively shared, particularly in Australia, where public-facing content appeared wellness-focused. Insider accounts show members were discouraged from external critique and funnelled into a particular worldview.

3. Deception

Score: 3

There is well-documented deception, particularly around recruitment and training. People signed up expecting a self-help or wellness retreat but were introduced to sexual practices without full informed consent. Former members describe gaslighting and psychological manipulation.

4. Exclusive Knowledge

Score: 2

Teachings were framed as esoteric and life-changing, with Nicole Daedone presenting OM (Orgasmic Meditation) as a near-sacred revelation. Knowledge was rarely open to critique and often portrayed as beyond mainstream understanding, but did not explicitly invoke divine origin.

5. Exploitation

Score: 3

There are credible allegations of sexual, financial, and labor exploitation, including: People coerced into unpaid labour, and encouraged to go into debt for further courses. Additionally individuals experienced pressure to do sexual acts under the guise of “healing”. This includes testimonies from Australians who trained in the U.S. and then returned to run or support Australian branches.

6. Fear, Guilt, & Intimidation

Score: 2

Shame and guilt were used extensively. Members who questioned the process were told they were “resisting growth.” Fear of exclusion or being labeled as “unwilling to evolve” was used to maintain compliance.

7. Isolation

Score: 1

Australian members were not always in residential communes, but once involved, there was increasing social isolation from non-members. Emotional and time demands limited outside relationships, though this wasn’t always enforced physically.

8. Micro-Management of Daily Tasks

Score: 1

Participants were often on strict schedules, especially during intensives or longer training sessions. While Australian branches may have been less extreme than the U.S. headquarters, the ritualised OM practice was often central to one’s daily life. A level of individual autonomy could be maintained outside of retreats.

9. Monitoring Thoughts & Behaviours

Score: 1

There’s some evidence of emotional and behavioural monitoring, like public sharing circles and accountability exercises. This was more informal in the Australian context but still served to keep members conforming.

10. Punishment & Discipline

Score: 1

Members were verbally reprimanded or excluded for non-compliance or doubt. Punishment was more psychological than physical, particularly in the Australian setting, though some forms of humiliation or shunning occurred.

11. Thought Reform

Score: 2

There was clear manipulation of belief systems, particularly around redefining trauma, consent, and intimacy. While not always extreme, participants report being gradually reshaped to accept harmful dynamics.

12. Us vs. Them Mentality

Score: 2

There was a clear sense of superiority — OneTaste framed itself as the future of intimacy, and outsiders were seen as repressed, unevolved, or spiritually stunted. This fostered a mild but present elitism.

​

Total Score: 23/36

Overall Cult Ranking: 6. Cult

​

This places OneTaste (including its Australian operations) high on the cult spectrum, with particularly concerning scores in leadership, exploitation, deception, and manipulation. While the Australian branches may have operated with slightly less intensity, the foundational structure and ideology remained coercive.

OneTaste has been assessed with a total score of 23 out of 36 on the cult criteria, placing it firmly in the “Cult” category. While not every dimension of coercive control was present at the highest level—such as the relative freedom members had outside of formal courses—this case illustrates how a group can still be deeply destructive without exhibiting the most extreme behaviours in every category. OneTaste exemplifies the nuance within coercive dynamics: even partial control across multiple domains can result in significant psychological, financial, and emotional harm. Importantly, the group’s use of sexual exploitation is a serious concern in its own right. Such exploitation can occur in any context, and regardless of the presence or absence of other coercive features, it always warrants scrutiny and legal action.

​

Further Reading

• Leaders of 'orgasmic meditation' company were convicted of forced labor

• She called it 'orgasm meditation'. The court called it a decade-long sex trafficking operation

• Leaders of ‘orgasmic meditation’ company OneTaste found guilty in forced labor scheme

• Founder of ‘orgasmic meditation’ company gets 9 years in prison in forced labor conspiracy